Asus ProArt PX13
MSRP $2,000.00
“Sporting discrete GPU options, The Asus ProArt PX13 is dissimilar thing other you Can buy.”
Pros
- Excellent productivity performance
- Very bully imaginative performance
- Solid build quality
- Very bully keyboard
- Useful DialPad and apps
- Spectacular OLED display
Cons
- Battery life isn't The best
- Touchpad should beryllium a haptic version
- A spot thick
Asus isn’t a alien to introducing caller technologies aliases making them disposable to much people. Consider OLED displays, wherever Asus has been a leader in pushing its superb colors and inky achromatic to laptops nether $1,000. So, now that AMD has introduced its latest and possibly astir important laptop chipset, The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, it’s unsurprising that The Asus ProArt PX13 is 1 of The first machines to equip it.
The Ryzen AI 300 lineup introduces not conscionable a faster CPU and integrated GPU pinch awesome efficiency, but besides 1 of The fastest neural processing units (NPUs) connected a laptop today. It’s nary coincidence that “AI” is in The chipset’s branding. The ProArt PX13 leverages it for accelerated capacity and reasonably agelong artillery life, in a highly portable 13-inch laptop package.
Specs and configurations
Asus ProArt PX13 | |
Dimensions | 11.74 inches x 8.26 inches x 0.62-0.70 inches |
Weight | 3.04 pounds |
Processor | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
Graphics | AMD Radeon 890M Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 |
RAM | 32GB |
Display | 13.3-inch 16:10 3K (2880 x 1800) OLED, 60Hz |
Storage | 1TB SSD |
Touch | Yes |
Ports | 2 x USB-C USB4 1 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 1 x HDMI 2.1 1 x 3.5mm audio jack 1 x microSD paper reader |
Wireless | Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4 |
Webcam | 1080p pinch infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition |
Operating system | Windows 11 |
Battery | 73 watt-hour |
Price |
$1,700+ |
Asus offers conscionable 2 configurations of The ProArt PX13. My reappraisal portion is $1,700 pinch The Ryzen AI 9 chipset, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an RTX 4050 GPU, and a 13.3-inch 3K OLED display. For $2,000, you get The aforesaid configuration pinch an RTX 4060 GPU. There is nary RTX 4070 configuration, which is offered in The ROG Flow X13.
Hopefully location is immoderate much customization disposable in The future. A cheaper, 16GB exemplary model would beryllium nice, for example, arsenic would a 120Hz refresh complaint option.
That’s expensive, but nary much than The Dell XPS 13 and The MacBook Air M3 that are some astir $1,900. Each of these machines is in The precocious tier of premium 13-inch laptops, and The ProArt PX 13 is simply a caller member.
Design
The ProArt PX13 is simply a laptop in its ain class. There are plentifulness of 13-inch laptops retired there, but they thin to beryllium very bladed and almost ne'er support discrete graphics. In galore ways, The ProArt PX13 is simply a non-gaming type of The ROG Flow X13, a convertible 2-in-1, pinch a show that swivels 360-degrees into 4 modes: clamshell, tent, media, and tablet. It was different capable for a mini gaming laptop to person this benignant of hinge, on pinch its glossy screen, truthful it makes a spot much consciousness connected a consecutive mainstream device.
Asus doesn’t talk astir an progressive pen, and there’s not 1 in The box, truthful this isn’t intended to beryllium a utilized arsenic a integer sketching tool. But The various 2-in-1 modes are awesome for sharing contented and consuming media — particularly since HDR contented looks awesome acknowledgment to The OLED display.
Considering The ProArt PX13 against different 13-inch laptops, it’s a reasonably mainstream machine. It’s not peculiarly bladed astatine up to 0.70 inches — The MacBook Air M3 is conscionable 0.44 inches heavy and The XPS 13 is 0.60 inches — nor is it peculiarly ray astatine 3.04 pounds compared to The XPS 13 astatine 2.6 pounds and The MacBook Air M3 astatine 2.7 pounds. It’s moreover thicker than The 16-inch MacBook Pro. As we’ll see, it’s easy to group speech a chassis that’s a small thicker and heavier fixed a ton of powerfulness packed distant inside. For creators connected The go, in particular, The ProArt PX13 is plentifulness small.
It’s besides very good built, pinch an all-aluminum chassis that’s conscionable a small little rigid in The lid than The XPS 13 and adjacent to The MacBook Air M3. Like those machines, The ProArt PX13 has a bottommost chassis and keyboard platform that are some rather robust. The hinge is soft in opening pinch 1 hand, and it remains in spot during use.
I for illustration The ProArt PX13’s design. It doesn’t person The sleek simplicity of either The Dell aliases The Apple, pinch much fierce venting and a spot of a bolder artistic and pinch an all-black colour way. Asus aimed for evoking powerfulness alternatively than elegance, and it’s fitting.
Keyboard, touchpad, and Asus DialPad
The keyboard has ample keycaps and a freely layout. The lettering is blocky and rather visible in immoderate lighting, and for darker environments The backlighting is rather agleam (maybe excessively agleam astatine its highest setting). The switches are heavy and springy, pinch a comfortable bottoming action. It mightiness beryllium conscionable a small little snappy than I for illustration and feels somewhat little precise than The MacBook Air M3’s Magic Keyboard, but I for illustration The Asus cardinal consciousness amended than The XPS 13’s. And The Dell’s zero-lattice layout is harder to get utilized to.
The touchpad is simply a mechanical version, and it’s fine. I would for illustration each laptops astatine these prices to usage haptic mechanisms, but astatine slightest this 1 is bully and ample — very overmuch for illustration The Zenbook S 16 aliases ROG Zephyrus G16.
Still, The MacBook Air M3’s Force Touch haptic touchpad is simply a batch better, arsenic is The XPS 13’s (except for its hidden nature).
Fortunately, The show is touch-enabled, which makes consciousness for a 2-in-1.
Interestingly, Asus included its virtual Asus DialPad characteristic connected The touchpad. It’s a information indentation pinch a fastener in The mediate that’s supported by The ProArt Creator Hub package that provides a big of imaginative functionality. The Dial provides other functionality in a assortment in imaginative apps, arsenic good arsenic accessing various strategy settings.
The Creator Hub allows for enhanced colour management, capacity optimizations, and more. It’s a spot overmuch to excavation into, but creators will for illustration its elasticity and customizability.
Connectivity and webcam
The ProArt PX13 has a batch much connectivity than astir 13-inch machines. There are 2 USB4 USB-C connections, which person astir of The functionality of Thunderbolt 4, on pinch a bequest USB-A port, an HDMI 2.1 connection, and a microSD paper reader.
The XPS 13 and MacBook Air M3 some person conscionable 2 USB-C ports pinch Thunderbolt 4 (although The Apple besides has a MagSafe 3 relationship for power), and neither person SD paper support. The XPS 13 doesn’t person a 3.5mm audio jack. Wireless connectivity is afloat up to day pinch Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4.
The webcam has a 1080p resolution, pinch an infrared camera for Windows 11 Hello facial recognition. That solution is The caller standard, and The ProArt PX13 Can grip basal web conferencing good enough.
Performance
The biggest communicative present is The caller AMD Ryzen AI 300 statement of chipsets, which promises a important uptick in performance. There are 3 versions, The Ryzen AI 9 365 pinch 10 CPU cores and 20 threads and 12 GPU cores in The Radeon 880M integrated graphics. The Ryzen AI 9 370 and 375 some person 12 CPU cores and 24 threads and 16 GPU cores. All usage 28 watts of powerfulness by default and Can beryllium configured to tally astatine betwixt 15 and 54 watts. The caller chipsets usage a operation of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, pinch The second being much compact but conscionable arsenic accelerated arsenic The others.
The superior title includes Intel Meteor Lake, The Qualcomm Snapdragon X, and The Apple Silicon M3. Meteor Lake has respective versions, but The astir communal is The Core Ultra 7 155H pinch 16 cores (six Performance, 8 Efficient, and 2 Low Power Efficient) and 22 threads, moving astatine 28 watts pinch a minimum of 20 watts and up to 115 watts of Turbo power.
The Snapdragon X Elite has 12 cores (eight capacity and 4 efficient) moving astatine up to 3.8GHz. Both person moderately accelerated integrated graphics. Finally, The M3 chipset ranges in powerfulness from The guidelines exemplary pinch 8 CPU cores and either 8 aliases 10 GPU cores up to The M3 Max pinch 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores.
The ProArt PX13 uses The Ryzen AI 9 370 HX 370 chipset. My reappraisal portion utilized The RTX 4050, an entry-level GPU, pinch The faster RTX 4060 arsenic an alternative. As we’ll spot in our suite of benchmarks, it’s a very accelerated chipset for a 13-inch laptop, and erstwhile mixed pinch The discrete graphics makes for a overmuch faster machine. It does tally a spot basking and large nether load, but not unusually truthful for (as we’ll see) a accelerated laptop.
When compared pinch The Dell XPS 13 9345 pinch The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 and moving Windows connected Arm, The ProArt PX13 is astir arsenic accelerated in CPU-intensive benchmarks for illustration Cinebench 2024 and Geekbench 6. I can’t comparison overmuch more, because not galore different benchmarks tally natively The Dell. Looking astatine GPU performance, The ProArt PX13 is simply a batch faster. It would beryllium moreover much faster pinch The RTX 4060. The Asus is besides faster than The MacBook Air M3 in these benchmarks.
Overall, The ProArt PX13 is incredibly accelerated for productivity users, and will churn done The astir demanding workflows. It will besides service arsenic a bully entry-level 1080p gaming laptop. Note that The Asus Zenbook S 16 uses The aforesaid AMD chipset but pinch The integrated Radeon 890M graphics. That GPU scored 3,207 in The 3DMark Time Spy benchmark compared to The ProArt PX13’s overmuch faster 8,503.
Cinebench 2024 (single/multi) |
Geekbench 6 (single/multi) | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme |
|
Asus ProArt PX13 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / RTX 4050) |
116 / 974 | 2,690 / 14,423 | 15,298 |
Asus Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / Radeon 890M) |
110 / 949 | N/A | N/A |
Dell XPS 13 9345 (Snapdragon X1E-80-100 / Adreno) |
121 / 921 | 2,805 / 14,511 | 6,397 |
Dell XPS 13 9340 (Core Ultra 7 155H / Intel Arc) |
96 / 658 | 2,109 / 11,134 | 6,667 |
Surface Laptop 7 (Snapdragon X1E-80-100 / Adreno) |
105 / 826 | 2,388 / 13,215 | 5,880 |
HP OmniBook X (Snapdragon X1E-78-100 / Adreno) |
101 / 749 | 2,377 / 13,490 | 6,165 |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 (Snapdragon X1E-84-100 / Adreno) |
126 / 766 | 2,957 / 15,358 | 7,153 |
Asus Zenbook 14 (Core Ultra 7 155H / Intel Arc) |
95 / 468 | 2,270 / 12,149 | n/a |
Apple MacBook Air 13 (M3) |
141 / 601 | 3,102 / 12,078 | 8,098 |
But past we request to besides request to see really The ProArt PX13 performs for a creator, which arsenic The sanction implies is The laptop’s superior target. And here, Asus did a awesome occupation of creating a powerful machine.
Looking astatine 2 imaginative benchmarks — Pugetbench Premiere Pro that runs in a unrecorded type of Adobe Premiere Pro and Pugetbench Photoshop, which besides runs in The unrecorded Adobe app — The ProArt PX 13 does well.
In Premiere Pro, which Can usage a Windows laptop’s GPU to velocity up definite imaginative processes, The ProArt PX13 is faster than respective laptops pinch overmuch faster GPUs. That includes The Acer Swift X 14 pinch The RTX 4070 and The Asus ROG Flow Z13 pinch The RTX 4060. It’s a batch faster than The Dell XPS 14 pinch The aforesaid RTX 4050, and The Zenbook S 16 pinch AMD’s Radeon 490M integrated graphics can’t support up.
Apple’s M3 chipset has various CPU optimizations that velocity up video encoding and decoding, and The MacBook Air M3 is reasonably accelerated here. I included The MacBook Pro 16 pinch The M3 Max chipset arsenic a proxy for The MacBook Pro 14, which is astir arsenic fast. The M3 Max is simply a batch faster for video editing.
In Photoshop, The ProArt PX13 was again very fast, starring each but The MacBook Pro 16. This is down to The Ryzen AI 9’s capacity and is little influenced by The GPU.
Overall, Asus has made a very accelerated and highly portable laptop for creators. As we’ll see, its capacity is matched up good pinch its fantabulous OLED display.
Pugetbench Premiere Pro |
Pugetbench Photoshop |
|
Asus ProArt PX13 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / RTX 4050) |
Bal: 4,850 Perf: 5,292 |
Bal: 7,394 Perf: 7,397 |
Asus Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 / Radeon 890M) |
Bal: 2,132 Perf: 2,374 |
Bal: 7,248 Perf: 7,299 |
Acer Swift X 14 (Core Ultra 7 155H / RTX 4070) |
Bal: 4,678 Perf: 5,168 |
Bal: 6,245 Perf: 6,397 |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 (Core i9-13900H / RTX 4060) |
Bal: 4,513 Perf: 5,115 |
Bal: 5,354 Perf: 6,047 |
Dell XPS 14 (Core Ultra 7 155H / RTX 4050) |
Bal: 3,536 Perf: 3,983 |
N/A |
Apple MacBook Air 13 (M3 8/10) |
Bal: 3,633 Perf: N/A |
N/A |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M3 Max 16/40) |
Bal: 8,046 Perf: N/A |
Bal: 10,392 Perf: N/A |
AI performance
I’d emotion to opportunity really The AMD AI 9 chipset’s very accelerated NPU performs comparative to The competition. It’s rated astatine 50 tera operations per 2nd (TOPS), compared to The Qualcomm Snapdragon X chipsets astatine 45 TOPS and The Intel Meteor Lake astatine 10 TOPS. The Apple M3’s Neural Engine (NE) has 18 tops. MacBook users will request to hold for The M4’s 38 TOPS to subordinate those ranks.
The problem is that we don’t person bully AI benchmarks that tally crossed level and straight trial NPU and NE performance. Microsoft has group its Copilot+ PC NPU request astatine 40 TOPS aliases more, and Apple is supporting its upcoming Apple Intelligence features crossed each MacBooks going backmost to The M1 chipset — so, Apple is counting connected CPU, GPU, and RAM to dress up for earlier NE deficiencies.
Right now, it doesn’t matter much. There’s not a batch in Windows that will utilize accelerated NPUs. Microsoft is only supporting Qualcomm pinch its Copilot+ AI features, and moreover that’s limited. There are immoderate apps that Can usage an NPU, and possibly they’ll beryllium sped up. And by moving those apps connected The NPU, they won’t beryllium arsenic accelerated arsenic if they ran connected discrete GPUs — which are a batch faster than NPUs — but they’ll beryllium a batch much efficient. We conscionable can’t trial immoderate of it without cross-platform benchmarks.
Asus includes respective apps that tout AI support, including StoryCube for managing photos and videos and MuseTree for creating and managing imaginative workflows. Those apt use from The mixed NPU and GPU AI performance, giving you astatine slightest a fewer easy ways to play pinch The caller capabilities.
Battery life
The adjacent situation for The ProArt PX13 and its AMD chipset is artillery life. After all, while Intel hasn’t caught up in efficiency, some Qualcomm and Apple tally Arm chipsets that thin to lead The way. It’s 1 point to battalion in a batch of capacity today. A laptop besides needs to person awesome artillery life to compete.
Asus packed in 73 watt-hours of battery, capacity which is simply a batch for a 13-inch laptop. The XPS 13, for example, has conscionable 55 watt-hours, while The Zenbook S 16 has moreover much astatine 78 watt-hours. Notably, The MacBook Air M3 has conscionable 52.6 watt-hours.
Looking astatine these results, The ProArt PX13 can’t travel adjacent to matching The astir businesslike laptops today. The 2 Intel Meteor Lake laptops present are deceiving — astir moving The aforesaid Core Ultra 7 155H chipset are person to The ProArt PX13. While The Qualcomm laptops person very beardown video looping artillery life (the least-demanding test), The MacBook Air M3 lasts The longest erstwhile doing existent work.
The ProArt PX13 has decent artillery life for specified a portable laptop that Can grip reasonably demanding imaginative work. But you’ll request to transportation your powerfulness adapter on pinch you.
Web browsing | Video | Cinebench 2024 | |
Asus ProArt PX13 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) |
8 hours, 7 minutes | 11 hours, 12 minutes | 1 hour, 12 minutes |
Asus Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) |
12 hours, 42 minutes | N/A | 2 hours, 24 minutes |
Dell XPS 13 9345 (Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100) |
12 hours, 29 minutes | 22 hours, 9 minutes | 1 hour, 37 minutes |
Dell XPS 13 9340 (Core Ultra 7 155H) |
12 hours, 14 minutes | 19 hours, 35 minutes | 1 hour, 27 minutes |
HP Omnibook X (Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100) |
13 hours, 37 minutes | 22 hours, 4 minutes | 1 hour, 52 minutes |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x (Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100) |
12 hours, 5 minutes | 17 hours, 3 minutes | 1 hour, 52 minutes |
Surface Laptop 7 (Snapdragon X1E-80-100) |
14 hours, 21 minutes | 22 hours, 39 minutes | N/A |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 (Snapdragon X1E-84-100) |
12 hours, 31 minutes | 14 hours, 33 minutes | N/A |
Asus Zenbook 14 Q425 (Core Ultra 7 155H) |
12 hours, 25 minutes | 18 hours, 1 minute | N/A |
Apple MacBook Air (Apple M3) |
19 hours, 38 minutes | 19 hours, 39 minutes | 3 hours, 27 minutes |
Display and audio
The 13.3-inch 16:10 3K (2880 by 1800) OLED show is outstanding. It looks awesome retired of The box, pinch bright, move colors and inky blacks. That’s thing caller for OLED displays, and Asus does it arsenic good arsenic anyone.
My colorimeter validates The panel’s suitability for creators. Its colour gamut is wide astatine 100% of sRGB, 97% of AdobeRGB, and 99% of DCI-P3. They’re besides meticulous astatine a Delta-E of 0.64 (less than 1.0 is considered excellent). Brightness was very bully astatine 380 nits, though not The brightest I’ve seen for OLED, and opposition is 26,510:1 pinch The accustomed cleanable blacks.
The show completes The package for imaginative work. Media consumers will besides emotion The display. Audio was conscionable OK, though, pinch dual speakers that are bully capable for strategy sounds and YouTube videos. But music, TV shows, and movies request for a bully brace of headphones.
A typical mobile laptop for demanding creators
If you’re looking for a laptop for video editing aliases high-end photography work, you’ll want accelerated capacity and a show pinch fantabulous colors. The ProArt PX13 provides both. It’s not The fastest laptop we’ve reviewed for this activity — not moreover close, really.
But fewer are truthful portable. No, artillery life isn’t great, but that’s not to beryllium expected. The ProArt PX13 will fto you get your activity done without lugging astir a immense laptop. And that’s good worthy The costly price.
Editor: Naga